In Minnesota, be careful about hiding your vehicle to prevent a lawful repossession
May 26, 2011 by Todd Murray · Leave a Comment
I often get calls from people whose vehicles are about to be repossessed. The callers sometimes tell me that the repossession agent threatened to have them arrested if they don’t tell him where the vehicle is located and want to know whether they are guilty of a crime by refusing to tell the repo agent where the vehicle is.
Under Minnesota law, it’s a crime if:
(1) You are (a) legally obligated for an auto loan; (b) you know where the vehicle that is secured by the auto loan is located; and (c) with intent to defraud, you refuse to disclose the vehicle’s location to a creditor or repossession agent that is legally entitled to repossess the vehicle.
(2) You–whether you are the borrower or not–conceal the vehicle if you know that the creditor is legally entitled to repossess the vehicle.
The potential penalty, provided by Minnesota Statute section 609.62, is imprisonment for up to three years or a fine of up to $6,000.
So under Minnesota law, it may be a crime to refuse to disclose the location of, or otherwise conceal, a vehicle that your lender is legally entitled to repossess. The key phrase here, though, is “legally entitled to repossess.” You may have defenses to the repossession, which would alleviate the potential criminal penalties because the lender isn’t legally entitled to repossess your vehicle. It’s probably best to be proactive and discuss the situation with an attorney before the repo man is knocking on your door. You should also check out this post for some suggestions that may allow you to keep your vehicle. Again–and I can’t emphasize this enough–don’t wait until the repo man is at your house to consider your options and talk to an attorney.
It’s definitely worth noting that I’ve never been involved in a case where a repossession agent or lender filed criminal charges against someone for refusing to tell them where the vehicle was or for concealing the vehicle. In my experience, repo agents use the threat of arrest to intimidate consumers into turning over the vehicle and rarely, if ever, act on them. But there’s a first time for everything and consumers should tread carefully because of the potential for criminal penalties.
If you’re facing repossession and want to discuss your legal rights with an attorney experienced in vehicle repossession cases, feel free to contact me. I offer 30 minute consultations for $175 and can help you figure out the best course of action for your situation.
Senator Franken introduces Arbitration Fairness Act to protect consumers’ rights
May 19, 2011 by Todd Murray · Leave a Comment
A group of U.S. Congressmen, including Minnesota’s Al Franken, introduced a new bill that would eliminate forced arbitration clauses in employment, consumer, and civil rights contracts. The impetus behind the proposed law appears to be the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in AT&T v. Concepcion. In Concepcion, consumers sued AT&T for false advertising. Because the value of their case was only $30, it was consolidated into a class action. AT&T tried to stop the lawsuit by activating the mandatory arbitration clause in the service contract, which not only required the case to be heard in a behind-closed-doors private arbitration forum, but also banned class actions altogether. This contractual language was buried in the fine print of the consumers’ contract and, like most consumer contracts, was not negotiable and offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. Both lower courts rejected AT&T’s argument and struck down the arbitration clause in the contract as unconscionable because it severely limited the consumers’ rights.
In an already notorious 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down these lower court decisions. The Court applied the Federal Arbitration Act to uphold the contractual ban on class actions and forced arbitration. Although the FAA was originally passed to ensure that courts enforced commercial arbitration agreements between two companies, the Court’s decision expands the scope of the FAA and effectively allows companies to insulate themselves from liability when they defraud a large number of customers of a relatively small amount of money.
Because the Court’s decision involved interpretation of a federal statute and not the Constitution, it can essentially be overturned through legislation, which is where Franken’s bill comes in. From the press release:
What the Arbitration Fairness Act Does:
- Restores the original intent of the FAA by clarifying the scope of its application.
- Amends the FAA by adding a new chapter invalidating agreements that require the arbitration of employment, consumer, or civil rights disputes made before the dispute arises.
- Restores the rights of workers and consumers to seek justice in our courts.
- Ensures transparency in civil litigation.
- Protects the integrity of the Civil Rights Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, among others.
“Workers and consumers should never be forced to give up their rights to get hired for a job, or to get a cell phone,” said Senator Franken.“I’ve introduced the Arbitration Fairness Act to ensure that workers and consumers have the right to choose arbitration over litigation, instead of being forced into it by corporations.”
Press Release | May 17, 2011
Anti-consumer bills pass MN Senate Judiciary Committee
May 3, 2011 by Todd Murray · Leave a Comment
The anti-consumer bills that I wrote about here and here have passed the first hurdle at the Minnesota legislature. The bills cleared the Senate Judiciary committee last week and are headed for the Republican-controlled Senate floor. Supporters of the bills claim that they will lead to more job creation by lowering the cost of doing business. To me, though, the key point was made by Jim Carey, the President of the Minnesota Association for Justice:
On the heels of the biggest economic downturn since the depression…our legislature wants to reward these wrongdoers by passing legislation that will allow companies to cheat consumers; hurt small businesses by shifting costs to private health insurers and remove Minnesotan’s constitutional right to remedy when harmed by negligent wrongdoers and fraudulent business practices.
4 tort reform bills pass committe, head to senate floor | MinnLawyer Blog | April 29, 2011
Florida court rules that debt collector can’t use Facebook to contact a debtor’s family
April 28, 2011 by Todd Murray · Leave a Comment
Last December, I posted about a Florida woman who sued a debt collector for contacting her family on Facebook. It turns out that the judge agreed with her and ruled last month that the debt collector could no longer contact her–or her family and friends–on Facebook or any other social-networking site. Click below for all of the details.
Debt collectors must tread lightly on social media | Orlando Sentinel | April 17, 2011 (via Consumerist)
Lost your wallet? 9 steps to take to protect yourself from identity theft.
April 12, 2011 by Todd Murray · Leave a Comment
Losing your wallet (or having it stolen) can be a nightmare. Here are 9 steps to take to limit the damage, courtesy of Money Health Central:
1. Call the police. Report the crime.
2. Call the credit card company and debit card banks to report the theft immediately. They can deactivate the cards to prevent further charges. These stolen cards were used within minutes at a nearby drug store for $24, twice at a gas station for $5, and at a convenience store for $59.
3. If you have a joint account holder, call that person to look on the back of the card for the 24-hour telephone number to report stolen cards. Google or call directory assistance. Report the theft immediately!
*****
To see the remaining 6 steps, click through (link below) to the Money Health Central post.
9 Steps To Protecting Yourself When Your Wallet Is Stolen Or Lost | Money Health Central | April 11, 2011
