Claiming garnishment exemptions in Minnesota

June 29, 2009 by Todd Murray · 1 Comment 

Editors’ note: this post only discusses exemptions in Minnesota. For a detailed explanation of exemptions in another state, please consult with a consumer attorney in your area.

Without question, dealing with garnishment is the most frustrating aspect of debt collection for consumers. Whether it is a bank or wage garnishment, having a debt collector seize your hard-earned money is a significant disruption to your life and can cause a great deal of stress. But many sources of funds are exempt from garnishment, which means that a debt collector cannot keep those funds.

In Minnesota virtually all forms of need-based government aid are exempt from garnishment. Some of the most common forms of need based aid are social security, supplemental security income (SSI), energy assistance, and medical assistance (MA). Other types of need based aid that are exempt include: Minnesota family investment program (MFIP), emergency assistance and emergency general assistance (EA & EGA), work first program, general assistance medical care (GAMC), and Minnesota supplemental assistance (MSA). This is not an exhaustive list and virtually any form of government aid that you receive based on your income is probably exempt from garnishment under Minnesota law. Other common Minnesota exemptions include any money you receive for child support, unemployment benefits, workers’ compensation, and veterans’ benefits. Some of the less common exemption sources of funds include retirement pensions (up to a certain dollar amount), disability, and insurance proceeds for damages to exempt property (usually your home or vehicle). And while its not technically an exemption, under current Minnesota law a debt collector cannot seize funds from a joint account that do not belong to the judgment debtor.

In addition, a debt collector may only seize 25% of your after-tax wages through a wage garnishment. This exemption also applies if the debt collector garnishes your bank account after you deposited your pay check. But if you make only the federal minimum wage (or less) your wages are usually completely exempt from garnishment. And if you receive any form of need-based aid, such as those described above, your wages are totally exempt from garnishment. Minnesota law provides for this exemption if you currently receive need-based aid, or if you received any need-based aid in the last 6 months. This is an important provision for Minnesotans receiving energy assistance. Most recipients of energy assistance receive it from October through March, which would make the recipient’s wages exempt for the entire year if she re-enrolls in the program the following season.

To claim an exemption, it is important first to understand the garnishment process. This post gives a general overview of how the process works. For a wage garnishment, the debt collector must provide you with a form notifying you of their intent to garnish and an exemption form 10 days before starting the wage garnishment. To claim an exemption from a wage garnishment, all you have to do is note the appropriate exemptions on the exemption form and mail it back to the debt collector. Its critical to do this immediately, or at least within 10 days of receiving the form. You should also provide proof of your exemption, such as your benefit notice, with the exemption form.

For a bank garnishment, you will not get notice of the garnishment until 5 days after the bank seizes your funds. Fill out the exemption form that the bank and debt collector mail to you, noting the appropriate exemption. You also need to provide proof that the funds that were seized by the bank arose from an exempt source. This last point is the cause of considerable confusion for consumers. Its not enough to show the debt collector that you receive exempt money, you also have to prove that the funds that were actually seized contained this exempt money. Debt collectors will refer to this as “tracing”. Sending the debt collector a copy of your bank statements that show the deposit of exempt funds, along with your benefit statements will usually accomplish the task.

If you merely mail the completed exemption form to the debt collector, and fail to provide the required tracing, the debt collector will probably object to your exemption and refuse to return your money. If this happens, you should schedule a court hearing in front of a judge to determine whether your funds are exempt. Court administration will help you set up the hearing and provide notice of the hearing to the debt collector. On the day of your hearing, be sure to bring proof of your exemption AND bank statements proving the funds seized were from an exempt source. Failure to do so could delay the court’s decision or could lead to the court denying your exemption.

Finally, its important to note that claiming an exemption when you are not entitled to one could lead to the court ordering you to pay a penalty to the debt collector. Make sure any exemptions you claim are legitimate.

Feel free to download my free guide: How to Survive Garnishment. It’s packed with information and tips for handling garnishment. And if the guide doesn’t answer your questions, I offer 30 minute garnishment consultations for $150.00. Please click here to contact me and set one up.

How to answer a debt collection lawsuit in Minnesota

June 18, 2009 by Todd Murray · 1 Comment 

Editor’s note: this article only discusses collection lawsuits in Minnesota. It is written to provide general information about the process of responding to a Minnesota collection lawsuit. Since the facts and laws involved in each lawsuit are different, the information in this article is necessarily generic. This article is not meant to be a substitute for consulting with an attorney about the unique facts surrounding your case. It is probably best to consult with a lawyer with experience defending collection lawsuits before deciding to represent yourself.

I recently had a client come into my office with a court judgment entered against him by a debt collector. He acknowledged being served with the lawsuit, but thought it was bogus because the lawsuit did not have a court file number on it. And when he called the local courthouse to verify whether the lawsuit was legitimate, the court had no record of such a lawsuit. Based on this information, he did not respond to the lawsuit and the debt collector entered a default judgment and sought to garnish his wages.

In virtually every state, a lawsuit is started by filing it with the court. But Minnesota is a unique state because a lawsuit is started by serving the defendant. Therefore, a lawsuit in Minnesota will almost never have a court filing number. And the courts will not have a record of the lawsuit until the plaintiff files the lawsuit and pays the filing fee. But this doesn’t mean the lawsuit is not legitimate. If you are served with a lawsuit in Minnesota, you MUST answer the lawsuit within 20 days. If you do not answer the lawsuit, it is likely that a default judgment will be entered against you without a court hearing.

So the first step to respond to a collection lawsuit is to answer it. An answer is a formal legal document that responds to each of the allegations in the lawsuit. Your answer should be in a format very similar to the lawsuit itself. It should have the same caption, which provides the applicable county and judicial district and names each of the parties. The body of your answer should either admit or deny each allegation in the lawsuit. Its best to number each paragraph of your answer to correspond with each numbered paragraph of the lawsuit. If you don’t know whether an allegation is true or false, deny the allegation. When you’ve finished responding to each of the allegations, sign and date the answer. You then serve the answer by mailing a copy (keep the original for your records) to the debt collector’s lawyer, or the debt collector itself if they do not have a lawyer.  You don’t have to file your answer with the court and pay the filing fee until the debt collector does so.

But answering the lawsuit is just the first step. Upon receipt of an answer, most debt collectors will serve you with written discovery, called interrogatories, request for production of documents, and requests for admission. You MUST respond to the debt collector’s discovery within 30 days. Pay particular attention to the requests for admission. If you do not respond to each admission within 30 days, the admission will be considered completely true. You don’t want to inadvertently admit to owing the debt by not responding to the requests for admission.

If you properly respond to the discovery, the next step is usually a court hearing, most likely a summary judgment hearing.  Make sure to respond to the debt collector’s motion papers by the deadline provided on the motion. Then, be sure to attend the hearing and explain to the judge why you do not owe the debt. You should also attempt to become familiar with the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules of General Practice before the hearing.

If you live in Minnesota, feel free to download my free Answer form and instructions. And if you want help defending yourself against a collection lawsuit, feel free to contact me.